Bitcoin donations to: 1CE9UfWJcHBYkWPns7iqBqZgKhd5xfqEaM thanks!
Buy Bitcoins easily by clicking HERE!


Use coupon radiopreppers for 20% off on the above site.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10
31
Morse Code / Re: CW Operators needed...
« Last post by Michael on April 30, 2019, 04:42:28 AM »
Well, that being said, I’ll just quote the most important parts of the thread:

Thread:

“Seasoned CW Operators Needed

 Marty N*** Apr 26   #116022 

Seasoned CW operators, Uncle Sam needs you, well actually the traffic system needs you. Operators at all levels are needed, but I am putting out a specific call to those of you who are a little more seasoned to fill urgent needs in some special assignments. Traffic handling experience is desired, but not required, as training will be provided.

We all enjoy the amateur radio service as a hobby, but we also have an obligation to serve. Traffic handling is an enjoyable endeavor and it provides a life-line in the event of a catastrophic event.

As I mentioned above, operators are needed at all levels and I would like to hear from all of those who are interested in serving, but there is an urgent need for those in particular who have good code proficiency.

For more information, please contact me directly at: marty.ray@...

Regards,
Marty R** N***
Central Area Coordinator”

Statistics:

“Jim, W***** Apr 27   #116052 

Hi Art et. al:

We can always use people with experience or those who want to get
experience.

During a major Federal disaster exercise in 2016, the CW portion of the
traffic system scored an accuracy rate of 99.998 percent across over 10,200
data points. The CW networks also scored the shortest message propagation
times, that is; the time measured from when a message was tendered for
origination in the simulated disaster area consisting of Alaska, Northern
California, Idaho, Oregon and Washington State, to the time the message
appeared in the data stream at the National Response Coordinating Center
(NRCC) in Washington, D.C.

CW nets actually performed slightly better than the digital networks in
terms of accuracy (the latter scored 99.997 percent across fewer data
points), and considerably better in terms of measured propagation time
through the network.

The exercise evaluation report is rather lengthy and includes quite a few
tables showing the data collected. However, suffice to say, CW proved to be
highly effective. Part of that success was related to the operators
involved. Many had commercial or military experience while others were
experienced CW traffic operators with regular net experience and solid
communications skills developed over time. Simply put; *there is no
replacement for training and experience.*

Traffic nets are an ideal way to learn REAL communications procedures. One
must communicate over specific distances, at specific times, and under all
propagation conditions. After all, disasters don't wait for optimum
conditions. Perhaps equally important is the fact that the message content
varies considerably. Every address is different. Telephone numbers and
e-mails are unique. The variety in traffic work far exceeds the predictable
content of casual QSOs or contest/sprint exchanges. If one can perform
effectively on traffic nets, DXing and contesting will come much easier.

Most importantly....it's fun and challenging. There's real camaraderie in
traffic work.

Here are a few resources to get one started:

http://radio-relay.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/RRI-Training-Manual-TR-001-2017-Draft-for-Distribution.pdf

http://radio-relay.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/RRI-Introductory-Training-2018.pdf

http://radio-relay.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/RRI-Traffic-Operations-Manual-2017-FINAL.pdf

http://radio-relay.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/RRI-TRAFFIC-OPERATIONS-AID-1720r3.pdf

Marty is right....we need a deeper bench and we need to be bringing new CW
operators into the system. Last year's hurricane season proved that Amateur
Radio is still needed in major disasters.  Why not learn how to properly
assist now?

73,

James W**** (W*****) - SKCC 6***
Radio Relay International
Central Area Staff“
32
Morse Code / Re: CW Operators needed ...
« Last post by Sparks on April 29, 2019, 11:14:04 PM »
An interesting thread has shown up on the SKCC Google Groups mail list.

That Google group is history by now (my bolding):

The Straight Key Century Club is the fastest growing group of  straight key Morse code operators and enthusiasts in the world. Organized in January 2006 the club has thousands of members around the globe. This Groups.io group is a meeting place for general discussion by SKCC members of all topics related to manually keyed Morse code, including mechanical bugs and sideswipers. It is the successor to the Yahoo SKCC group as of September 2017.
33
Morse Code / Re: CW Operators needed...
« Last post by Sparks on April 29, 2019, 10:56:25 PM »
Interesting to read, once you have registered (and been accepted) in three stages:

First, register here: https://groups.io

Then, apply for membership here: https://groups.io/g/skcc

To be accepted there you must be a member here: http://www.skccgroup.com
34
Morse Code / CW Operators needed...
« Last post by Michael on April 29, 2019, 06:18:55 PM »
An interesting thread has shown up on the SKCC Google Groups mail list. What’s more interesting is the CW statistics!

Thread:
https://groups.io/g/SKCC/topic/31359872#116070

Statistics:
https://groups.io/g/SKCC/message/116052
35
Antennas / Re: Antenna wire
« Last post by Alpha_Greywolf on April 23, 2019, 04:56:01 AM »
Is it ok to connect shorter runs of wire to make one long antenna run? Any cons to this? Thanks to everyone for your input.

A linked dipole is just lengths of wire temporarily attached to each other to increase its length.
Mine is cut for 20/40 with crimped and soldered spade connectors to bridge the gaps.

It has been outside in high winds and all weather, the only time it broke was when the suspension pole was blown over and the wire snagged. A quick replacement of the spade connector and it was good to go again.
36
Antennas / Re: Tent Pole antenna - could it work ?
« Last post by Alpha_Greywolf on April 23, 2019, 04:50:08 AM »
Did you conduct this experiment?

If so:

How did you find the pole as an expedient antenna?

What results were obtained?

What would you do differently to enhance it's usability?
37
General Discussion / Re: Hello from North Wales
« Last post by Alpha_Greywolf on April 19, 2019, 04:26:06 PM »
Try


That is the fun of amateur radio, we have a licence to experiment
38
General Discussion / Re: Hello from North Wales
« Last post by gil on April 19, 2019, 07:59:52 AM »
The half-wave end-fed would solve your ground problem, but you would need a pretty tall mast or tree... I wouldn't worry too much about the ground with a full size horizontal loop... You might just have to try...

Gil.
39
General Discussion / Re: Hello from North Wales
« Last post by Alpha_Greywolf on April 18, 2019, 04:03:46 AM »
Square loop could work and is one I'm looking at, along side the half-wave end fed.
I do have a small (dis)advantage, my QTH is over Sandy soil as such the ground losses are low... but getting a good earth is like catching fog in a bucket.
40
General Discussion / Re: Hello from North Wales
« Last post by gil on April 18, 2019, 02:27:21 AM »
What about a square loop?

Gil.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 10